Analysis: Hoagland’s “Dark Mission”

Dark Mission—The Secret History of NASA (revised and expanded edition), written by Richard C. Hoagland and Mike Bara, is the first conspiracy theory book that PluribusOne™ has reviewed. It appeared on our radar screen as a coincidence—perhaps a synchronicity considering that some of our earlier posts cross into the same territory, and some of that material happens to add to their well-argued thesis. 

That NASA leadership was composed of a group of Freemasons, former Nazi scientists, and occult “Magicians” from the outset is verifiable through credible sources beyond those the authors used for their thesis. There is no real question about it. The big question is: Has NASA been covering-up discoveries made on the Moon, Mars, and elsewhere—hard evidence that an ancient and possibly nonhuman civilization left remnants of their culture in the form of stone-works, domes, and technological debris? 

Many deep secrets have been kept from the public with respect to all aspects of the space program. This has been corroborated for us by other sources, some of whom were long-term NASA employees unmentioned by Hoagland and Bara, and some were leading figures related to our personal 1960s experiences and involvement with the National Investigations Committee on Aerial Phenomena (NICAP). We know, for example, that reports of certain undeniable “close encounters” with extremely advanced flying objects were never made public and remain classified today. 

Much of Hoagland’s theorizing about “hyperdimensional” processes comports well with our multidimensional and multiversal Theory of Everything. He concludes, for example, that higher spatial dimensions underlie the reality commonly perceived in terms of three dimensions. His book contains a detailed and elaborate exposition on this matter that we will not attempt to synopsize here. Although the author’s use of language makes the concepts as simple as possible, many readers may have difficulty with that portion of the book. However, it is worth the effort; higher “source” dimensions are real. 

What can PluribusOne™ contribute to Hoagland’s effort apart from our grasp of the structure and processing of Omniverse as presented in earlier posts? For one thing, we can lend support to their conclusion that the common link among Freemasons, former Nazi scientists, and black magicians lies in ancient knowledge of Egypt and Sumer. Our extensive research over many years supports the accuracy of that conclusion. And we agree with the significance of the tetrahedron (Bucky Fuller would have too). 

Yet the authors fail to make any reference to the Ennead, the nine Egyptian deities. Two opposing tetrahedra touch six points inside a sphere, all at 19.5° above and below. Six times 19.5 equals 117, which numerologically resolves to 9 (1+1+7=9). Each side of each tetrahedron is 3.33° of a circle—another numerological nine—and three such sides equal 99.9° (=27=9). The total sides of two tetrahedra are 12 in number and 12 times 33.3° equals 399.6 (=27=9). A circle itself is 360°=9. Hoagland mentioned that there were nine successful Moon missions and 27 (=9) lines in Solomon’s Seal, but he missed all the other nines and their significance in venerating the Egyptian gods. 

Further indication that 33° Scottish Rite Freemasons, via predecessor Templars, hold knowledge of “hyperdimensionality” is displayed in our Image File #32 and the post: “Templar Secret Revealed.” The pattern of two tetrahedra within a sphere is depicted two-dimensionally inside the hidden compartment of a very old “Templar ring.”


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

2 Responses to “Analysis: Hoagland’s “Dark Mission””

  1. Craig Stephenson. Says:

    Hello Alan, perhaps you would be interested in the Youtube clip “The Biggest Secret Of Mankind- The Clementine Conspiracy a.k.a Project Golden Dragon”. It is just an hour long and to me was absolutely fascinating. The man behind it has spent 14 years researching what he claims in the clip, and seems to rely on (what seems to be to be) hard science and not the “out there” claims and conspiracies that Hoagland has become reknown for. If what this researcher claims is true, then it is actually more than a little scary. Would love to hear your views on it. Regards, Craig.

  2. PluribusOne™ Says:

    I watched the video you suggested from beginning to end and, of course, I didn’t miss the #9 on NASA’s mission logo for Clementine.

    I respect the filmmaker’s effort in the way that I respect the efforts of those perseverant miners who seek the legendary Lost Dutchman gold mine. However, my thinking is that the dragons and “fiery flying serpents” that were recorded long ago by people witnessing UFOs were metaphorical, just as NASA’s use of symbolism is not literal. This is not to say that dragons are impossible as a life-form, even enormous ones in some universe, but despite the appearance of rigorous scientific analysis, I don’t accept the filmmaker’s conclusions as being remotely conclusive, although it would make for an interesting Transformers-like science fiction story.

    My opinion is based on the fact that equally rigorous analyses can be made of photographs of cloud formations, and equally rational results can be described with the same precision. To some extent these descriptions reflect stories that are archetypally true, and therefore can seem literally true because the mind is very good at putting puzzle pieces together to make pictures. A common example of taking hard data and processing it but coming to the wrong conclusion is the wife who gathers various perceptions that she treats as clues to what she perceives as her husband’s mysterious behavior and assembles the puzzle in a way that “proves” he has a mistress when he doesn’t.

    As Albert Einstein recognized, nothing is more powerful than imagination. I’m sure that even Einstein’s imagination led him down some dead-end streets.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s